Apr 292010

Thank you to Scrangie, who pointed out on Twitter yesterday that nail polish maker OPI Products Inc. appears to have filed suit against Transdesign, an online seller of nail polish, for copyright infringement.  As many beauty aficionados know, Transdesign is a nice source of supply for OPI’s large nail polishes, because it has prompt shipping, a wide selection and low prices.  Unfortunately, it doesn’t appear that OPI’s complaint against Transdesign is available online, so it is hard to tell what the heart of this dispute really is about.

Well, I did a little research.  So the U.S. Copyright act says that the following categories of things can be protected by copyright law that are fixed in a tangible medium of expression:

  • literary works;
  • musical works, including any accompanying words;
  • dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
  • pantomimes and choreographic works;
  • pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
  • motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
  • sound recordings; and
  • architectural works.

But none of those categories of things seem to be “nail polish,” “makeup” or “beauty related” items.  Rather, these are expressive works, such as an artist, writer or even an architect or software programmer might create.  Can one copyright a color?  Or a paint (which is basically what nail polish is)?  I know that we own the copyright to our photographs of nail polish.  One might even be able to claim copyright protection to a particularly original application of nail art (similar to a painting by an artist).  But to the nail polish itself?

As a next step, I looked on the U.S. Copyright Office website for registrations filed by OPI Products, Inc. and found about 19 entries:

Some of the registrations concern visual displays, photographs and textual material relating to their products.  So here’s an example from the OPI Hong Kong collection:

Okay, fair enough but I’m still not sure what’s going on here.  Does anyone else know anything?

Please follow us on....

  4 Responses to “Does OPI Own a Copyright in its Nail Polish?”

  1. I thought it was more of a trademark dispute. you can’t copyright a color but you can trademark it. Perhaps OPI is doing this to protect the trademarked colors and the Copyright is for the Names of the colors so other companies can’t come out with OPI France Collection. Get what I mean?

    • I do–but I think book and movie titles can’t be copyrighted (words and short phrases are exempt). You are right that you can trademark a color that is used in associated with another product, but I’m not sure you can trademark a color that IS the product itself. Can’t wait to learn more…

  2. Found more info on the OPI v. Transdesign suit on another blog: http://carinaeletoile.com/2010/04/30/opi-update/. Overly competitive pricing makes it tough on legitimate distributors/resellers, so now I understand OPI’s reason for pursuing this.

  3. Thank you kwas–it looks like OPI is asserting rights in the trademarks (names of the polishes and in their own names. This should be interesting!!

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.