Eyeshadow Tom Ford

Tom Ford Spring 2012 Cream Color for Eyes: Swatches and Review

April 1, 2012

I picked up a few items from Tom Ford Spring 2012 collection, a series of limited edition items based on a metallic, multidimensional texture. Here, I’m reviewing the Cream Color for Eyes in 01 Platinum and 02 Guilt ($40/each). Both smooth creams are in heavy glass containers, with 0.21 oz. of product. This $40 Tom Ford item includes more product than the 0.14 oz. in the Chanel Illussion D’Ombre (which sell for $36).

Chanel’s Illusion D’Ombre which are a cross-linked gel, which tends to hold together like a gummy bear–indeed, my Chanel’s still behave nicely, have plenty of moisture, and apply well although they are several months old. In contrast, Tom Ford’s Cream Eyeshadow have a soft, soufflé buttery texture almost like the inside filling of an excellent French macaron. Both lines have a texture that is unbelievably complicated–I would imagine it is nearly impossible to get this type of complexity and depth in a powder.

There are four colors in the release (all swatched here on Karlasugar), but I limited my selection to two–a warm golden Guilt, and a cool minky brown called  Platinum.  The price for these is high–although not as high as the $700 Tom Ford velvet slippers that I tried on just to confirm that they were fabulous (they were).  But at $40 each, the total for one eyeshadow approaches the cost of a single palette in nearly any other high end beauty brand, and the $80 for both of these is equal to a palette in Mr. Ford’s own line.

First up, Guilt is an over-the-top beautifully sparkling pot of richness:

The label:

Second, there was Platinum, an extremely complicated brown-taupe, which goes on more silvery on my eye that it does on my arm. Again, this looks very brown in the pot, but more silvery mink when applied:



This combination reminds me of two Guerlain Terracotta liners from a few seasons back (Gold Rush and Smoky Metal), but the texture, color, and overall look of these Tom Ford Creams is far superior. The Tom Ford’s are so easy to apply and to blend, and to get a quick, sophisticated look.

I used Guilt on my inner lid, then dabbed Platinum in the crease and outward from that. I used my finger, although a concealer brush would work well too.  So pretty!  Platinum applied slightly cooler and the silvery sheen really came out. The colors have a slight micro sparkle that’s absolutely lovely. So far so good. I hope that I don’t fall completely in love with these, or I’ll need the two remaining colors. I’ve paid so much for these, I know I’ll make a point to use them over the next several weeks to see how much of a dent I can make. They’re gorgeous, flattering and universal colors.

At $40, these are clearly a luxury product with a unique texture and complexity. They feel plushy on the lids, and have a luxury look and feel. They don’t emphasize lines, bumps.  They can be worn sheerly or with heavily for extra pigment.

Some might look at L’Oreal Eternal Sunshine and L’Oreal Bronzed Taupe as the closest substitutes. In my personal opinion, these aren’t “dupes,” given the texture difference, but these will put you in the same color family. The L’Oreal’s don’t have the plushy, buttery feel of the Tom Ford, and they are not as complicated. The L’Oreal’s have a thinner (although highly metallic and pigmented) texture.

You can see more reviews of these eyeshadows here:

Please follow us on....

You Might Also Like

  • Marina(Makeup4all) April 2, 2012 at 1:29 am

    Nice to see you back, Amy. Thanks for this review.

  • Christina April 2, 2012 at 3:11 am

    This is really nice and it certainly made me think of Chanel. It would be nice to see that they are made without shimmer so that your powder or liquid luminizer can do their part of the job.

  • Eileen April 2, 2012 at 9:26 am

    I picked up the shadows in Spice and Illicit. My eye color loves warm toned shadows so those two work very well for me. I apply them with Bobbi Brown’s cream eyeshadow brush and, if I want a bit more “oomph”, I build the color by patting it on with my finger. I’ve been quite pleased with how they look and how they wear. They have complexity and depth and don’t look like they’re just sitting on the surface as your comparison swatches clearly illustrate. In truth, I do prefer a good powder eyeshadow, but when it comes to a cream formula, TF has created a beauty.

    Apropos the price of TF eyeshadows. As you pointed out, he does give a lot of product for the money; much more so than many other brands. If you’re really going to use them, then they are an absolute bargain. If you’re only going to use them a few times, then they are a blatant luxury. From my point of view, I would never automatically rule out TF simply because of the cost. I own several TF items and find myself reaching for them on a regular basis. So, for me, they’ve been good purchases. It also helps that I have a full TF counter at a nearby Neiman’s so I never buy blind.

  • tammy April 2, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    Thanks for the great review! I have been hoping someone would review these. Could you tell me if they crease?

    • Amy April 2, 2012 at 6:24 pm

      Hi Tammy, I got very slight creasing by the end of a very long day on one eye. I don’t have oily lids, and I did not use a base. There was still plenty of color left, it’s something that I could have easily brushed away.

      • Amy April 2, 2012 at 6:25 pm

        Aw, how sweet! Thank you!

  • Jane April 2, 2012 at 5:48 pm

    Amy, how gorgeous! They creams are high-gorgeous and looks easy enough to get a sohpisticated eye without a lot of fuss. I’m definitely going to the TF counter at Bergorf to check these out. Thanks for the great review and the beautiful swatches.

  • Tom Ford Makeup Collection for Spring 2012 | MakeUp4All, Ladies Beauty April 5, 2012 at 6:55 am

    […] collection is already out. You can see some reviews and swatches over at Cafe Makeup,  Makeup And Beauty Blog and The Beauty Look Book.I’d really love to try Burnished Rouge […]